Latest whitepaper

Real-Time Analytics for Customer-Facing Applications Whitepaper

Analytics is no longer just a tool for internal decision-makers.

Download free

Customer story

Customer Facing Analytics Meets Agents

Eightfold’s Move from Redshift.

Read the story

Product Comparisons

Replace as serving layer

PhoenixAI vs.
Trino / Starburst

Trino and Starburst are excellent for ad-hoc lake exploration and large ETL jobs — the workloads they were designed for. When teams use them as a serving layer for dashboards and AI agents, the architecture breaks: queries take seconds to minutes, concurrency saturates quickly, and there is no path to real-time data. PhoenixAI replaces Trino as the serving engine. Your lake and ETL workflows stay exactly where they are.

PhoenixAI

vs

Trino / Starburst

When to switch

Three signals Trino has hit its serving ceiling.

01

Dashboard queries take 10–60 seconds

Trino reads from remote object storage on every query. Every dashboard page load issues a round-trip to S3 or GCS. End users abandon before the data arrives. PhoenixAI’s intelligent local SSD cache delivers sub-second responses on the same data — without moving it out of your lake.

02

A handful of concurrent queries saturates the cluster

Trino was built for a few large ad-hoc jobs, not many small concurrent ones. When customer traffic or AI agent workloads hit simultaneously, the cluster saturates and queries queue. PhoenixAI sustains 10,000+ QPS at sub-second latency — the access pattern serving layers actually need.

03

You need real-time data alongside historical lake queries

Trino queries what’s in your lake — which is only as fresh as your last batch ETL. For workloads that mix streaming event data with historical lake tables in the same query, Trino has no answer. PhoenixAI ingests streaming data natively and federates lake tables in one SQL layer.

Head-to-head

PhoenixAI Trino / Starburst
Query latency (serving) Sub-second with local SSD cache Seconds to minutes; every query reads remote storage
Concurrency 10,000+ QPS sustained Built for few large jobs; saturates under concurrent load
Data freshness Sub-10s with native streaming ingestion As fresh as last batch ETL; no streaming ingestion
Real-time + historical in one query Native: stream tables + lake tables unified Not supported; separate systems required
Native upserts PK-based upserts on streaming tables No native upsert capability
Local data caching Intelligent SSD cache, auto-promoted No local cache; all reads from remote storage
Lakehouse support Iceberg, Delta Lake, Hudi — native Native Iceberg and Delta; strong lake connector
Ad-hoc lake exploration Capable, not the primary focus Core Trino strength — keep for this
Large ETL jobs Not the design point Well-suited; keep Trino for ETL
Operations model BYOC managed: AWS, GCP, Azure Self-managed OSS or Starburst Galaxy SaaS

Teams that made the switch.

SmartNews

Replaced Trino + ClickHouse

3.6× faster

than Trino on ad-hoc

Replaced two serving engines — Trino and ClickHouse — with a single PhoenixAI deployment. 3.6× faster than Trino on ad-hoc queries. One SQL layer instead of two systems to maintain.

Herdwatch

Replaced Athena on Iceberg (same architecture)

700ms–1.5s

from 2–5 minutes

Swapped the query engine on existing Iceberg tables. No data movement. Query latency dropped from 2–5 minutes to 700 milliseconds to 1.5 seconds. Same migration pattern applies to Trino-served lake tables.

Yuno

Replaced Redshift + Athena stack

40%+

compute cost reduction

Consolidated Redshift and Athena into PhoenixAI. Latency from 3 seconds to sub-1 second. Freshness from 1 hour to 5 seconds. 40%+ compute reduction. One serving layer instead of two.

What stays on Trino

PhoenixAI replaces Trino as the serving layer — not as the exploration or ETL tool. The following workloads remain on Trino and are not in scope for PhoenixAI.

Ad-hoc lake exploration Large-scale ETL & data prep Cross-catalog federation for analytics One-off investigative queries Data engineering workflows

Sub-second on your Iceberg tables. No data movement.

We’ll run a live walkthrough on your lake schema and show you the latency difference directly.